Published by 6000933 on

91国产精品 Professor Cited in U.S. Supreme Court Opinion

[[{"fid":"29928","view_mode":"default","fields":{"format":"default","field_file_image_alt_text[und][0][value]":"John Plecnik","field_file_image_title_text[und][0][value]":false},"link_text":null,"type":"media","field_deltas":{"1":{"format":"default","field_file_image_alt_text[und][0][value]":"John Plecnik","field_file_image_title_text[und][0][value]":false}},"attributes":{"alt":"John Plecnik","height":438,"width":350,"style":"margin-left: 5px; margin-right: 5px; float: right;","class":"media-element file-default","data-delta":"1"}}]]John Plecnik, an associate professor of law in 91国产精品鈥檚 Cleveland-Marshall College of Law, was cited by the United States Supreme Court in the dissenting opinion of . The case could have significant implications on how federal administrative judges are appointed by numerous agencies across government.

On June 21, Justice Sonia Sotomayor cited Plecnik's article, , in her to the court鈥檚 7-2 decision in the case.  Justice Sotomayor utilized Plecnik's research to further her argument that the Supreme Court should clarify its jurisprudence on the Appointments Clause of the Constitution.

"It's the honor of a lifetime to see my work cited as authority in a Supreme Court opinion, and I am humbled," said Plecnik.  "I thank Cleveland-Marshall and Cleveland State for supporting my research, and I look forward to continuing my work related to these types of Constitutional questions."

has been on the faculty at Cleveland-Marshall since 2010. Previously, he served as an attorney with Thacher Proffitt & Wood LLP, as a law clerk to Judge David Gustafson of the United States Tax Court and as an adjunct professor of law at Georgetown University.

###